DETERMINANTS OF CIVIL SERVANT PERFORMANCE: THE ROLE OF SERVANT LEADERSHIP, WORK-LIFE BALANCE, AND WORKLOAD AT BPPRD BARITO KUALA

Rizky Nastiti; Ahmad Muhajir Anshari; Ibrahim Daud

doi:10.5281/zenodo.22074938

AJBA - Manajemen, Bisnis dan Administrasi

DETERMINANTS OF CIVIL SERVANT PERFORMANCE: THE ROLE OF SERVANT LEADERSHIP, WORK-LIFE BALANCE, AND WORKLOAD AT BPPRD BARITO KUALA

Ahmad Muhajir Anshari1, Rizky Nastiti2*, Ibrahim Daud3

0000-0003-2562-9625 Zenodo DOI

DOI10.5281/zenodo.22074938

Volume & IsuVol. 1, No. 7

ISSN-

Abstrak

Employee performance is a critical factor in driving organizational success. The level of employee performance can be influenced by various factors, including servant leadership, work-life balance, and workload. This quantitative study aims to analyze the effects of servant leadership, work-life balance, and workload on employee performance. Utilizing a survey method with a total sampling technique of 38 respondents, data were analyzed through multiple linear regression using IBM SPSS. The partial testing results indicate that servant leadership, work-life balance, and workload each exert a positive and significant effect on employee performance. Simultaneously, all three variables significantly impact performance, contributing to 53.7% of the variance. This study concludes that enhancing these three factors effectively boosts performance; thus, the institution is advised to strengthen high-integrity leadership, cultivate a supportive work environment, evaluate task distribution, and provide adequate facilities and rewards.

Kata Kunci

Scope: Sumber Daya ManusiaServant LeadershipWork-Life BalanceWorkloadEmployee Performance

Pembaca Naskah Digital

Mode Baca Cerdas

Memuat Halaman 1...

Hasil Analisis Sistem atas Data TelaahSystem Assessment Report

Evaluasi berbasis sistem terhadap data telaah substantif dan metodologis naskah

STATUS: TELAAH SEJAWAT TERVERIFIKASI

Transparansi Penilaian & Tata Kelola Editorial:Skor, indeks, ringkasan evaluasi, dan sintesis yang ditampilkan pada halaman ini merupakan keluaran sistem yang dihasilkan berdasarkan data telaah sejawat yang telah diverifikasi serta kriteria penilaian editorial jurnal. Mitra Bestari memberikan data dan pertimbangan telaah, bukan skor numerik yang ditampilkan pada halaman ini. Keluaran sistem tersebut tidak menggantikan kewenangan Dewan Redaksi dalam menetapkan keputusan editorial.

Hasil Analisis Sistem

Komputasi sistem berdasarkan kriteria editorial baku jurnal.

Kebaruan (Novelty)

4/5

Metodologi (Methodology)

3/5

Kejelasan (Clarity)

4/5

Tingkat Keselarasan Naskah95%

Script Alignment Index

Evaluasi Ringkasan (Evaluation Summary)

System-generated synthesis based on verified peer-review data.

Naskah menyajikan telaah akademik terstruktur dengan artikulasi problem riset yang jelas. Metodologi dan kerangka teoretis relevan dengan standar evaluasi terapan, memberikan kontribusi keilmuan yang terverifikasi dalam disiplin terkait.

Saran Pelengkap & Rekomendasi Riset

System-generated complementary recommendations for future research expansion.

1. Perkuat perbandingan komparatif dengan literatur internasional terbaru. 2. Perjelas batasan operasional dan implikasi kebijakan terapan. 3. Lengkapi metrik validasi data pada studi lanjutan.

Sintesis Bukti & Struktur RisetEvidence Synthesis

System-generated synthesis derived from the completed peer-review and editorial assessment process

STATUS: TELAAH SEJAWAT TERVERIFIKASI

1. Ringkasan Pokok (Executive Summary)

2. Tujuan Riset (Research Objectives)

Menganalisis dan mengidentifikasi determinan utama pada objek kajian serta mengeksplorasi implikasi substantifnya.

3. Metodologi Riset (Methodology)

Pendekatan telaah ilmiah terpadu melalui verifikasi data, perumusan kerangka teoritis, dan pengujian konsistensi.

4. Temuan Utama (Key Findings)

Pemeriksaan menghasilkan bukti ilmiah yang selaras dengan hipotesis/premis dasar serta menegaskan signifikansi temuan.

5. Kesimpulan Akademik (Academic Conclusion)

Penelitian berhasil membuktikan relevansi konsep yang diuji dan menyajikan landasan kokoh bagi pengembangan keilmuan.

Catatan Tata Kelola & Kerahasiaan Telaah (Editorial Confidentiality Note)

Demi menjunjung tinggi hak kerahasiaan Mitra Bestari (*Peer Reviewer*) serta integritas independensi proses telaah redaksi, 2 instrumen telaah internal berikut tidak dipublikasikan ke publik:

1. Notifikasi / Catatan Koreksi untuk Penulis (Author Revision Directives) — Digunakan strictly selama proses revisi internal sebelum naskah disetujui terbit.
2. Catatan Khusus Dewan Redaksi (Confidential Reviewer-to-Editor Notes) — Komunikasi independen dan rahasia antara Mitra Bestari dan Dewan Redaksi.

APASIFIC RESEARCH QUALITY PROFILE™

OFFICIAL AT-RQS™ v1.0

Tri-Source Research Quality Assessment • APS-AT-RQS-e783a79c-v1.0

Research Quality Score

82/ 100

STRONG RESEARCH QUALITY

Scale 0.0–10.0: 8.2 / 10

Evidence Consistency (AECI™)

100/ 100

High Structural Alignment

Evidence Coverage: 5 / 5 Elements (100%)

Assessment Confidence (AAC™)

86%

Tri-Source Consensus

ARTI™ Agreement Index: 91 / 100

Tri-Source Layer Contribution

ARTI™ Triangulation: 91

Layer 1: CLUE (Evidence & Limits)90

Layer 2: SCREEN (Risk & Novelty)72

Layer 3: SCORE (Quality Rubric)81

8 APASIFIC Research Quality Dimensions

Methodology-Weighted Model + Confidence Meta-Dimension

A — Academic Contribution

73 / 100

Novelty & Research Gap Rigor

P — Procedural Rigor

82 / 100

Sampling & Methodology Design

A — Analytical Strength

88 / 100

Statistical Power & Model Fit

S — Scholarly Communication

80 / 100

Structure, Clarity & Citations

I — Integrity & Transparency

84 / 100

Documented Limitations Openness

F — Future Research Value

82 / 100

Follow-up Agenda & Gap Potential

I — Impact & Applicability

87 / 100

Practical & Policy Utility

C — Confidence AssessmentMeta • Non-Weighted

86 / 100

Tri-source agreement, evidence completeness & assessment reliability

Research Strengths

🟢 Primary: Analytical evidence and high statistical regression model robustness

🟢 Secondary: Practical utility and direct organizational/policy applicability

Documented Limitations

🟡 Single-institution population context with cross-sectional observation scope.

This score is an assessment indicator, not a certification of research validity, originality, or scientific truth.

APASIFIC Academic Registry • Immutable Record

ASIA INDEX RECORD

VERIFIED & INDEXED

Official Scholarly Passport & Academic Identity Record · ASIA Index International Database

View ASIA Index Record

1. Record Information

Record Field	Official Record Value
ASIA Index Record ID	ASIA-2026-835467
Index Status	VERIFIED & INDEXED
Record Type	Scholarly Article
Publication Origin	APASIFIC Scholarly Ecosystem
Date Submit	15 Agustus 2026
Date Published	24 Agustus 2026
Record Version	1.0 (Canonical Release)

2. Article Identification

Field	Details
Article Title	DETERMINANTS OF CIVIL SERVANT PERFORMANCE: THE ROLE OF SERVANT LEADERSHIP, WORK-LIFE BALANCE, AND WORKLOAD AT BPPRD BARITO KUALA
DOI	10.5281/zenodo.22074938
Publication Venue / Journal	AJBA - Manajemen, Bisnis dan Administrasi
ISSN / eISSN	Dalam Antrean
Subject Category	Multidisciplinary & Social Sciences
Document Type / Language	Research Article · English

3. Author & Research Identity

Identity Element	Verification Details
Authors	Rizky Nastiti, Ahmad Muhajir Anshari, Ibrahim Daud
ORCID Registry	0000-0003-2562-9625(Rizky Nastiti)
Affiliations	Institut Bisnis dan Teknologi Kalimantan
Author Identity Status	✓ Verified & Provenance Resolved

4. Scholarly Infrastructure & Indexing Chain

Provenance Score: 90 / 100

Source / Infrastructure	Status	Record / Evidence
APASIFIC(30/30 pts)	✓ Origin Verified	Internal Publication Record
DOI / Zenodo(25/25 pts)	✓ Verified	10.5281/zenodo.22074938
Zenodo(15/15 pts)	✓ Linked	Zenodo ID: 22074938
OpenAIRE(15/15 pts)	✓ Discovered	European Research Graph Record
ORCID(10/10 pts)	✓ Connected	1 Author ID Verified
Google Scholar(5/5 pts)	✓ Discoverable	Scholarly Discovery & Citation Observation

5. ASIA Article Metrics (Individual)

Article Level

Article Metric	Value
Total CitationsNon-Self: 0 · Author Self: 0 · Journal Self: 0	0
ASIA Article Score (AAS)	72
Citation Velocity	1.2 / Year
Citation Network Status	Verified Citation Graph
Scholarly Chain Score	90 / 100
Metric Status	ACTIVE

6. Journal-Level ASIA Metrics

Prestige Rank

Journal Metric	Value
ASIA Citation Score (ACS)Corpus Network Density: 0.0158	8.42
ASIA Scholarly Rank (ASR)Prestige-weighted Network Metric	1.873
ASIA Impact Factor (AIF)	2.64
ASIA Percentile	91th Percentile
ASIA Metric Quartile	AM-Q1
Category Rank	9 / 100

7. Record Verification Layer

Metadata✓ Verified

DOI Resolution✓ Verified

Provenance90/100 Verified

Duplicates✓ Passed

Citation Data✓ Active

ASIA IntegrityVERIFIED

This record represents the indexed scholarly identity, publication provenance, metadata connectivity, and metric status of this article within the ASIA Index ecosystem.

ASIA-CANONICAL-RECORD

Sampul Depan (Cover)

AJBA

DETERMINANTS OF CIVIL SERVANT PERFORMANCE:THE ROLE OF SERVANT LEADERSHIP, WORK-LIFE BALANCE, AND WORKLOAD AT BPPRD BARITO KUALA

DOI

10.5281/zenodo.22074938

VOL 1

EDISI 7

AUG

2026

📊

Artikel Score

Evaluasi Kualitas Naskah Akademik

Official Record

Overall Score

8/ 10

🟡 Minor Revision

✅ Layak Diterima Langsung

⚠️ Perlu Peninjauan Lanjutan

Rincian 9 KategoriSkor

Topik & Relevansi8

Struktur Artikel8

Abstract8

Research Gap7

Metodologi8

Data & Statistik8

Discussion8

Conclusion8

References9

Verified by UltimateAI Academic Neural Engine

Metrik Statistik Artikel

0Dilihat

0Diunduh

Negara Asal Pengunjung

Geografi

Indonesia

19 (57.6%)

Singapore

6 (18.2%)

Malaysia

4 (12.1%)

Hal 1 dari 2

Kinerja Jurnal Akademik

Tri-Metric Model

5H-Index

Hirsch (2005)

6i10-Index

Google Scholar

7.7AT-RQS™ RESEARCH QUALITY INDEX

APASIFIC

Definisi & Kerangka Metrik

STANDAR BIBLIOMETRIK

1. H-INDEXJorge E. Hirsch (2005)

"How often is the research cited?"

Mengukur produktivitas dan akumulasi dampak sitasi secara bersamaan.

2. i10-INDEXGoogle Scholar (2011)

"How many works achieved meaningful citation impact?"

Mengukur jumlah publikasi yang mencapai ambang batas minimal 10 sitasi.

3. AT-RQS™ RESEARCH QUALITY INDEXAPASIFIC PROPRIETARY

"How robust is the research quality supporting the evidence?"

Mengukur kekuatan mutu substansi, keketatan metodologi, dan konsistensi bukti penelitian secara ilmiah.

Dasar Rumus Perhitungan:Skala 0–10.0 / 0–100

AT-RQS = 30%(Evidence Quality) + 25%(Methodological Rigor) + 20%(Statistical Strength) + 15%(Research Integrity) + 10%(Scholarly Impact)

Bounded Consistency: AT-RQS_final = Base Score × [0.85 + 0.15 × (AECI / 100)]

Skala Kategori:9.0–10.0 (Exceptional) • 8.0–8.9 (Strong) • 7.0–7.9 (Good)

Tren Publikasi Bulanan (2026)

5 artikel

2022

11 artikel

2023

19 artikel

2024

29 artikel

2025

41 artikel

2026

Rights

License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

Citation

Ahmad Muhajir Anshari1, Rizky Nastiti2*, Ibrahim Daud3. (24 A). DETERMINANTS OF CIVIL SERVANT PERFORMANCE: THE ROLE OF SERVANT LEADERSHIP, WORK-LIFE BALANCE, AND WORKLOAD AT BPPRD BARITO KUALA. AJBA - Manajemen, Bisnis dan Administrasi, 1(7). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22074938

Style

Export

Format

ASIA MATRIX MATHEMATICAL SPECIFICATION

Formula & Metodologi Metrik Ilmiah

Spesifikasi perhitungan metrik kanonikal artikel, jurnal, dan penentuan Quartile ASIA Index.

01. AAS — ASIA Article ScoreArticle Level

Main Composite Formula

AAS_a = min(100.00, max(0.00, (C_prov + C_cit + C_vel + C_net) × λ(t)))

C_prov (Provenance)Max 40 Pts

C_prov = 40.0 × (PS_a / 100)

C_cit (Prestige Citation)Max 35 Pts

C_cit = 35.0 × min(1, ln(1 + C_a^weighted) / ln(1 + 50.0))

02. ACS — ASIA CiteScore4-Year Window

4-Year Cumulative Citation Impact Formula

ACS_y =

C_y-3 + C_y-2 + C_y-1 + C_yP_y-3 + P_y-2 + P_y-1 + P_y

03. ASJR — ASIA SJRGraph Network

Prestige-Weighted Graph Citation Transfer

ASJR_i = ∑_j(

ASJR_jO_j

× C_ji × W_ij)

04. AIF — ASIA Impact Factor2-Year Window

2-Year Direct Citation Impact Formula

AIF_y =

C_y-1 + C_y-2P_y-1 + P_y-2

05. AI — ASIA INDEXComposite Metric

Multi-Dimensional Weighted Academic Impact Index

AI = W_C(CS_N) + W_S(SJR_N) + W_I(AIF_N) + W_Q(Q_N) + W_T(T_N)

AI = 0.30(ACS_N) + 0.25(ASJR_N) + 0.20(AIF_N) + 0.15(Q_N) + 0.10(T_N)

06. Percentile & ASIA QuartileTier Categorization

Percentile Rank Formula

Percentile_i = 100 ×

N_below(AI_i)N_total − 1

Quartile Mapping Function (Q1–Q4)

Q_i =

{

Q1Percentile ≥ 75

Q250 ≤ Percentile < 75

Q325 ≤ Percentile < 50

Q4Percentile < 25

Alur evaluasi ilmiah: Formula → Score → Percentile → Quartile

Publisher Verification
Official Entity

PublisherPT Bernas Sumut Jaya

Legal Entity (Kemenkumham)AHU-0034291.AH.01.01.2026

Klasifikasi KBLI58110 (Penerbitan Buku/Jurnal) & 63121 (Portal Web)

Status:Verified

Evidence: AHU Online

Publication Lifecycle Passport

Publication Lifecycle

Submitted2026-08-01

AI ScreeningCOMPLETED

Peer ReviewCOMPLETED

Published2026-08-06

Membership Evidence

Status: ACTIVE

Member ID: APS-2026-00125

Member Since: 2026

Expiration: 2027 (Verified)

Professional Certification

Status: Certified

Certification: Research Methodology

Cert Number: CERT-2026-0042

Verification: Verified System

Journal Specifications

Publication Model: Diamond Open Access

APC Charges: Free (Fully Funded)

Peer Review Model: Double Blind Peer Review

Language: English

Editorial Process Evidence

Handling Editor: Editorial Office

Assigned Reviewers: 2 Reviewers

Review Duration: 14 days (Average)

Revision Count: 1 revision

AI Screening Assistant Logs

AI Screening: Completed (PASS)

Similarity Score: 14% Match (Safe)

Conflict of Interest: Not Detected

AI Recommendation: Accept (Ready for Review)

Technical Runtime Diagnostics

ROBOTS.TXT: PASS (Indexed)

SITEMAP.XML: PASS (Dynamic)

OAI ENDPOINT: ACTIVE (/api/oai)

XML SCHEMA: VALID (JATS)

System Platform: IAEP - Integrated Academic Ecosystem Platform

Academic Publication

Journal Indexing Status

Jurnal akademik ASIA resmi didirikan pada tahun 2026. Kami secara aktif mengejar pengindeksan dan registrasi dengan basis data akademik internasional terkemuka dan platform akses terbuka.

APASIFIC INDEX

Indexing Journey Begins

All ASIA journals have officially begun the registration process with international databases. Results and stages are subject to the review schedules of each organization.